Interaksi Simbolik Pengikut Gus Dur Dalam Syiar Dan Dakwah Pada Akun Instagram @Jaringangusdurian

M. Iqbal Nur Aulia Fazri

doi:10.33507/selasar.v3i1.1193

M. Iqbal Nur Aulia Fazri UIN Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33507/selasar.v3i1.1193

Keywords: Keywords: Caring for Gus Dur's Thought Da'wah, Gus Dur's Followers, Instagram @Jaringangusdurian, Symbolic Interaction

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Transformation of Gus Dur's da'wah thoughts for Gus Dur's followers towards social media Instagram @jaringangusdurian using Gus Dur's photo and video content. Because taking care so that there is still the preaching of Gus Dur's thoughts. Thus, the analysis in this study focuses on the symbolic interaction of Gus Dur's followers in preaching and da'wah on Instagram photos and videos @jaringangusdurian in 2021-2022, totaling 43 photos and 41 videos.

The theory used is symbolic interaction from George H. Mead about symbols and meanings to explain how there is symbolic interaction of Gus Dur's followers on Instagram @jaringangusdurian. The aim is to develop and enrich Gus Dur's theoretical literacy and thought proselytizing. This theory is divided into three studies, namely mind, self, and society. The methodology used is a qualitative approach, with the presentation of the data in the form of narrative content analysis. While the paradigm used is constructivist.

Research findings on categorized photo and video posts on Instagram @jaringusdurian. This categorization has symbols and meanings that the symbolic interactions of Gus Dur's followers @jaringusdurian follow the mindset of Gus Dur's 9 main values including: monotheism, humanity, justice, equality, liberation, brotherhood, simplicity, chivalry, and traditional wisdom. Mind (thoughts) in the category "Caring for Gus Dur's Values and Example" corresponds to the side of equality and monotheism, in the category "Imitating the Nation's Teacher" according to the value of having chivalry and traditional wisdom. Self (selfhood) in the category "No Practical Politics" has a value on the side of justice. Society (society) in the category of "Social Movement" has a value of humanity and brotherhood.

References

Abdurrahman Wahid. (2000). Prisma Pemikiran Gus Dur, Yogyakarta: LKIS.

Adila, C., Aeni, D. F., Shafrani, K., Danil, M., Alfais, F., Studi, P., Islam, P., & Ushuluddin, F. (2023). Strategi Pemanfaatan Instagram @ serambilirboyo Terhadap Perkembangan Dakwah Di Era New Media. 3(1), 17–34.

Budiantoro, W. (2018). Dakwah di Era Digital. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1369

Derung, T. N. (2017). Interaksionisme Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat. SAPA - Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral, 2(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.53544/sapa.v2i1.33

Husna, N. (2023). LOGIN DI CLOSE THE DOOR : DAKWAH DIGITAL HABIB JA ’ FAR PADA GENERASI Z. 3(1), 38–47.

Loka, W. P., Sumadja, W. A., & Resmi. (2017). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 21(2), 1689–1699. https://www.oecd.org/dac/accountable-effective-institutions/Governance Notebook 2.6 Smoke.pdf

Mathematics, A. (2016). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 10(Desember), 1–23.

Mufidah, L. N. (2015). Pemikiran Gus Dur Tentang Pendidikan Karakter Dan Kearifan Lokal. Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 15(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v15i1.172

Noor Haliemah dan Rama Kertamukti. (2017). “Interaksi Simbolis

Masyarakat Dalam Memaknai Kesenian Jathilan”, Jurnal ASPIKOM:

UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Vol. 3 No. 3, Juli.

Nugraha, Y., & Rahmatiani, L. (2018). Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 3(2), 64–70. http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/JMK/article/download/2900/2003

Tripambudi, S. (2012). Interaksi Simbolik Antaretnik di Yogyakarta [Interethnic Symbolic Interactions in Yogyakarta]. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(3), 321–342.